BC STORIES
Canada’s Time Crisis: Why British Columbia is Ending the Clock Change While Others Wait for a Domino Effect
British Columbia is ending seasonal time changes permanently, but the rest of Canada remains locked in a collective action dilemma over daylight saving time.

The Last ‘Spring Forward’ for British Columbia
As Canadians across the country prepare to nudge their clocks forward one hour this Sunday, residents of British Columbia are doing so with a unique sense of finality. Premier David Eby confirmed this week that the province is moving forward with a long-awaited plan to adopt permanent, year-round daylight saving time. The move marks the end of a decades-long debate in the Pacific province, effectively terminating the biannual ritual of ‘springing forward’ and ‘falling back’ that has governed Canadian life for generations.
The decision is rooted in both public health and overwhelming popular demand. Premier Eby highlighted the practical disruptions caused by the shift, noting that children and pets do not recognize the arbitrary change in time, leading to lost sleep for parents and increased stress for families. “When we change our clocks twice a year, it creates all kinds of problems,” Eby stated during the announcement. Beyond mere inconvenience, the Premier pointed to a spike in car accidents and a general decline in public well-being as primary drivers for the policy shift.
A History of Public Mandate and Political Stalling
British Columbia’s road to permanent daylight time has been long. In 2019, the province conducted one of the most successful public consultations in its history, with a staggering 93 per cent of the 223,000 respondents indicating they wanted to scrap the time change. While former premier John Horgan attempted to implement the change several times, the province initially hesitated, hoping to maintain alignment with southern neighbors in Washington, Oregon, and California.
However, B.C. has now decided to lead the charge. This bold move highlights a growing frustration with what political scientists call a ‘collective action problem.’ Peter Graefe, a political scientist at McMaster University, suggests that many jurisdictions are waiting for a leader to prove that the transition can be seamless. “Maybe it does take one place to move and it will have some impact in having other places saying, ‘Look, the sky didn’t fall, maybe we’ll try it as well,’” Graefe noted.
The Eastern Gridlock: Ontario and Quebec
In Central Canada, the situation is more complex. The Ontario legislature passed a bill in November 2020 that would end the time change, but with a significant caveat: the law only triggers if Quebec and New York State follow suit. This interdependence is driven by the need for economic and logistical synchronization, particularly regarding the stock markets and cross-border trade. Premier Doug Ford has expressed an openness to ending the practice, stating that Ontario will “eventually” stick with daylight saving time to stay in step with the rest of North America, but for now, the province remains in a holding pattern.
Quebec has similarly signaled that while they recognize the public desire to end the time change, no immediate legislative action is planned. Government officials in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Manitoba have also confirmed they are not currently pursuing a change, citing the need for regional alignment to avoid creating a patchwork of time zones that could disrupt travel and commerce.
The Prairie Divide
The debate remains particularly contentious in Alberta. In a 2021 municipal referendum, Albertans narrowly voted to keep the biannual change, with the ‘stay’ side winning by fewer than 3,000 votes. Despite this, the government led by Danielle Smith is re-examining the issue. Finance Minister Nate Horner recently suggested that the conversation is “probably coming towards us” again, as the government weighs the impact on airline schedules and professional sports against the potential health benefits.
Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek, however, has expressed skepticism about reopening the debate, suggesting that the narrow victory in 2021 should stand as a settled matter so that the government can focus on more pressing economic priorities.
The Biological Cost of Shifting Time
While the political debate focuses on trade and convenience, health experts are sounding the alarm on the biological toll of the time change. Rebecca Robillard, co-chair of the Canadian Sleep Research Consortium, argues that the issue is far more significant than losing a single hour of sleep. “It actually disrupts the alignment between the biological clock and the natural cycle of the sun,” she explained. This misalignment affects hormone release, insulin regulation, and metabolism.
Robillard points to a chilling list of ramifications associated with the time shift, including increased rates of stroke, heart attacks, mood swings, and even pregnancy complications. From a clinical perspective, the sudden shift forces the body into a state of ‘social jetlag’ that can take weeks to resolve.
The Counter-Argument: The Need for Morning Light
Despite the momentum for permanent daylight saving time, some experts warn of the downsides of year-round DST—specifically the loss of morning light in the winter. Patricia Lakin-Thomas, a professor at York University, notes that our circadian clocks are reset by morning light. Under permanent daylight saving time, some parts of Canada would not see the sun rise until nearly 10:00 a.m. in the middle of winter.
“Everybody loves the idea when you first announce it… but in the winter, we just hate it,” Lakin-Thomas warned. She argues that standard time is actually better for human health because it aligns more closely with the solar cycle, providing the morning light necessary to speed up our internal clocks and keep us in sync with the 24-hour day. As British Columbia embarks on this legislative experiment, the rest of the country—and the scientific community—will be watching closely to see if the benefits truly outweigh the costs.
BC STORIES
BC Ferries’ Overseas Deal Costs $1.5 Billion in Economic Losses, Union Group Warns
Building four new BC Ferries in China will cost Canada $1.5B in lost GDP and 10,000 person-years of employment, a new union-commissioned report finds.

Union Report Details Economic Fallout of Overseas Ship Building
A contract to construct four massive hybrid-electric BC Ferries vessels in China will mean a loss of approximately $1.5 billion in gross domestic product for Canada, according to a report released Thursday by the labour coalition Build Them Here.
The analysis, authored by Jim Stanford of the Centre for Future Work, calculates that building the ships abroad surrenders roughly 10,000 person-years of employment. Additionally, the study estimates that local construction would have generated $413 million in government tax revenues to help offset public costs.
Crown Corporation Defends Overseas Contract Decision
BC Ferries awarded the deal to a Chinese state-owned shipyard in May 2025, maintaining that no domestic shipbuilders submitted a final proposal. The Crown corporation stated that while two Canadian shipyards pre-qualified after criteria were adjusted to encourage participation, neither completed a bid.
Representatives for the ferry operator explained that the company could not delay replacing aging vessels until domestic capacity expanded, nor could it expect ferry passengers to bear the full financial burden of developing Canada’s shipbuilding industry through higher fares alone. The corporation also noted the ongoing local economic benefits generated through domestic maintenance contracts.
Labour Group Calls for Policy Reforms and Transparency
The report argues that provincial leaders had adequate notice over the past decade to prepare local manufacturing for the replacements. It points out that between 2003 and 2018, only two of 11 new vessels were constructed in British Columbia. Seaspan, the sole B.C. shipbuilder with facilities large enough for the job, withdrew from competing due to strict price and scheduling constraints.
Using economic modeling, Stanford’s team estimated the contract’s total value at $1.6 billion and criticized BC Ferries for withholding exact cost details. The coalition, representing 19 labour organizations, recommended seven policy changes, including provincial equity stakes in shipbuilding projects and new legal mandates requiring BC Ferries to maximize local economic returns.
BC STORIES
Why B.C. Municipalities Are Demanding an End to Provincial Secrecy and Funding Cuts
B.C. municipal leaders gather at the UBCM convention to push back against provincial non-disclosure agreements and cuts to housing and FireSmart funding.

Municipalities Push Back Against B.C. Government Policies
Municipal representatives from across British Columbia are preparing to confront the provincial government during the annual Union of B.C. Municipalities (UBCM) convention, scheduled for Sept. 14 to Sept. 18 in Vancouver. Local leaders plan to present three special resolutions targeting what they describe as an expanding “climate of secrecy” and the loss of critical community funding streams.
A primary point of contention is the provincial ministry’s widespread application of non-disclosure agreements. UBCM president Cori Ramsay stated that municipal employees are increasingly required to sign NDAs prior to discussing routine matters with provincial counterparts, sometimes before the subject of the meeting is even disclosed.
While acknowledging that non-disclosure agreements are appropriate at specific stages to safeguard cabinet confidentiality, Ramsay noted that current practices prevent transparent discussion on subjects of public interest. The executive’s resolution requests that the province restrict NDA requirements during local consultations to exceptional circumstances only.
Funding Reversals Cause Financial Strain
Local governments are also challenging the cancellation of $775 million from the Community Housing Fund, an intake suspended without advance warning during February’s provincial budget announcement. Ramsay indicated that 89 communities experienced lost investment on projects already underway, highlighting that developments in Parksville and Squamish had each spent approximately $1 million prior to the decision.
Wildfire preparedness represents another key area of friction. Concerns emerged early in the year when communities including West Kelowna reported diminishing FireSmart resources. The province subsequently limited the remaining $25 million by excluding fuel management and recovery initiatives, roughly six months before declaring a provincial state of emergency for wildfires. Municipalities are advocating for a predictable, long-term funding framework to enable multi-year wildfire mitigation efforts.
Upcoming Political Engagement
The upcoming convention takes place one month prior to local government elections set for Oct. 17. Despite the timing, Ramsay expects robust attendance from mayors and councillors, whether they intend to retire or seek re-election.
In addition to debating resolutions, delegates are scheduled to hear from provincial figures including Premier David Eby and B.C. Conservative Leader Kerry-Lynne Findlay. Agenda topics also include discussion on the local impacts of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) and modern treaty implementation.
BC STORIES
Why a Former Island Mountie Received a Conditional Discharge After Court Hearing
A former Vancouver Island RCMP officer was granted a conditional discharge with 18 months probation after pleading guilty to breach of trust in Nanaimo.
Conditional Discharge Handed Down in Nanaimo Court
A former Vancouver Island police officer who had a sexual encounter with a vulnerable woman following his shift will avoid a criminal record if he successfully completes an 18-month probation sentence.
Mark Tyler Hilland, 47, received a conditional discharge in B.C. provincial court in Nanaimo from Judge Reginald Harris on Friday, Sept. 11. Hilland had previously entered a guilty plea to breach of trust by a public officer in relation to a July 2, 2024 incident.
Details of the Offence and Court Findings
According to an agreed statement of facts, Hilland was completing paperwork in his service vehicle when he was approached by an Indigenous woman with whom he was acquainted. Her identity is protected by a publication ban. Unknown to Hilland at the time, she had prior involvement in the sex trade.
After Hilland left for an assignment, the woman was propositioned by another man for sex—an interaction described by Crown counsel Andrew McLean as negative and triggering traumatic past memories. Though she reported that encounter to police, Hilland was unaware of her report.
Later that evening, Hilland noticed she appeared distressed and asked how she was feeling. During their conversation, she exhibited flirtatious behavior and gave him her address, phone number, and door code, inviting him over once his shift ended. Following his shift on July 3, 2024, Hilland called her, visited her residence, and the two had consensual sex.
When they met again later, Hilland called the encounter a mistake and stated he would no longer contact her. Although she initially accepted this, she yelled an obscenity as he drove away and reported his actions to the Nanaimo RCMP.
PTSD Diagnosis and Impact
The court heard that Hilland was diagnosed in 2019 with post-traumatic stress disorder, alongside depression, mood alterations, and sleep difficulties. Before this event, he had served in high-crime or demanding posts, including Fort St. James and Gabriola Island, and responded to most critical incidents while stationed in Nanaimo.
Judge Harris determined that Hilland was suffering from PTSD during the incident, concluding that without the disorder, he would not have engaged in the impulsive and self-destructive behavior. While Crown counsel sought a suspended sentence that would entail a criminal record, defence counsel Brad Kielmann argued for a conditional discharge.
In granting the discharge, Harris noted Hilland’s lack of a prior criminal record, good character, and the severe impact a record would have on his employment. Harris ruled that a discharge was not contrary to the public interest despite the harm caused to the community and the woman’s vulnerability.
Probation Terms and Departure from Force
The victim did not submit a victim impact statement but told police she feared Hilland might return, experienced sleep disruptions, and worried about her parents’ reactions, noting it took a year to feel like herself again.
Under the conditions of his 18-month probation order, Hilland is forbidden from contacting the woman and must write a letter of apology to be delivered through his probation officer. His employment with the RCMP officially ended on Aug. 14 when he was discharged.
-
7 days ago
Your Current 3 Day Forecast — September 5, 2026
-
NATIONAL STORIES7 days ago
Why Global Figures and Leaders Are Speaking Out Over Mockery of B.C. Military Cadets
-
LOCAL4 days ago
What’s at Stake for Kelowna as Leaders Debate Closing the Downtown Supervised Consumption Site
-
BC STORIES7 days ago
Lower Mainland Illegal Gaming Investigation Leads to Charges and Cash Seizure
-
SPORTS7 days ago
BC Lions See Win Streak Snapped by Alouettes in 37-30 Loss
-
OPINIONS4 days agoHappy Labour Day! B.C. Is Politically Homeless — Can a New Party Finally Give Voters Somewhere to Go?
-
6 days ago
Your Current 3 Day Forecast — September 6, 2026
-
4 days ago
Your Current 3 Day Forecast — September 8, 2026