Infrastructure
Poilievre Slams High-Speed Rail Plan as a ‘$90-Billion Liberal Boondoggle’
Pierre Poilievre calls the $90-billion Toronto-Quebec City high-speed rail a ‘boondoggle,’ sparking a fierce debate over spending and land expropriation.
Conservative Leader Demands Cancellation of Toronto-Quebec City Rail
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has called on the Liberal government to immediately scrap its ambitious high-speed rail project linking Toronto and Quebec City. Speaking at a news conference near Peterborough, Ontario, Poilievre described the multi-billion-dollar infrastructure plan as a “ridiculous pie-in-the-sky Liberal spending initiative” and a significant waste of taxpayer funds.
The project, currently estimated to cost between $60 billion and $90 billion, aims to connect major urban centers including Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, and Quebec City. If completed, the rail network would slash travel times between Montreal and Toronto to just three hours—roughly half the current driving time. Despite these promises of efficiency, Poilievre remains unconvinced, labeling the initiative a “$90-billion Liberal boondoggle” that lacks financial viability.
Concerns Over Land Expropriation and Costs
A central point of contention in the debate is the potential for land expropriation. Alto, the Crown corporation managing the project, recently announced plans to contact property owners between Ottawa and Montreal for land assessments. While Alto CEO Martin Imbleau has stated a preference for fair settlements, he acknowledged that expropriation remains a possibility to ensure the project’s completion. Poilievre seized on this issue, characterizing the move as a “Liberal land grab” and criticizing the government’s recent legislative changes intended to expedite land acquisition.
Prime Minister Mark Carney has suggested the rail line could be designated a project of “national interest,” a move that would streamline federal powers to acquire necessary corridors. This has fueled anxiety among rural residents and farmers whose land sits along the proposed—but yet to be finalized—route.
Diverging Political Visions for Transit
The opposition from the Conservative leader highlights a growing divide over Canada’s infrastructure future. While Poilievre advocates for fiscal restraint and the protection of property rights, other leaders have expressed qualified support. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has signaled interest in the project, though he has specifically suggested the Toronto-to-Ottawa segment should follow the existing Highway 401 corridor to minimize disruption.
As Alto prepares to finalize the exact route by the end of this year, the project remains a lightning rod for political debate. Construction is currently slated to begin on the Ottawa-Montreal leg toward the end of the decade, but its future may ultimately depend on the outcome of the next federal election.