POLITICS

What Premier Smith’s Separation Timeline Means for Albertans and First Nations

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith faces scrutiny over her separation referendum timeline as legal experts and First Nations leaders weigh in on the challenges.

Published

on

Premier Smith Reconsiders Proposed Separation Referendum Schedule

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith recently backtracked on her proposed timeline for a potential separation referendum, citing existing legislation regarding provincial elections. In a leaked video from a July 30 town hall in Red Deer, Smith initially suggested that meeting federal Clarity Act requirements—specifically securing House of Commons approval and consulting with First Nations—could take two-and-a-half months, expressing hope to resolve the matter “for sure by this spring.”

However, during an unrelated news conference on Wednesday, Smith pointed to provincial rules that could impact that schedule. “We also have legislation that says that you can’t hold a referendum within a year of a general election,” she stated. “I’d have to see legally how quickly we could move in practical fact.”

Legal and Constitutional Boundaries

Legal experts clarify that while Alberta’s Citizen Initiative Act restricts citizen-led petitions within 12 months of a general election under Section 1.11, it does not bar the government from initiating a vote. University of Alberta constitutional law professor Gerard Kennedy noted that a citizen could not use the initiative act to force a binding referendum if the premier chooses not to sign off. “Someone who’s trying to enforce her promise couldn’t use the Citizenship Initiative Act to do so,” Kennedy explained, adding that “nothing is stopping the premier from holding a referendum” under the provincial Referendum Act once federal requirements are met. Still, Kennedy characterized Smith’s proposed schedule as “impractical” and “extremely ambitious.”

First Nations Raise Serious Concerns Over Consultation

The proposed timeline has drawn sharp criticism from Indigenous leaders. Blackfoot Confederacy president and Piikani First Nation Chief Troy (Bossman) Knowlton dismissed the schedule as a “political fantasy.”

Knowlton stressed that if a binding referendum were ever to occur, consultation would need to take place strictly on First Nations’ terms. He outlined numerous vital topics that would require discussion, including existing treaty provisions, the impacts of separation on Indigenous cattle and grain, the status of oil reserves on First Nations lands, the preservation of Indigenous spirituality and language, and consequences for nations whose territories cross into British Columbia and the United States.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BC STORIES

BC Conservative Defector Teresa Wat Joins New Provincial Party Caucus

Teresa Wat joins Peter Milobar’s new provincial party as its sixth member, creating B.C.’s third-largest legislative caucus following Conservative departures.

Published

on

Expanding New Party Becomes B.C.’s Third-Largest Caucus

Richmond-area MLA Teresa Wat has joined the newly formed provincial political party established by former Opposition finance critic Peter Milobar. Wat becomes the sixth member to join the still-unnamed group, which will form the third-largest caucus in the British Columbia legislature behind the NDP and the Conservatives when the assembly reconvenes next month.

Milobar, who serves as the interim leader, stated that Wat’s addition on Friday demonstrates growing momentum for a serious right-of-centre alternative aimed at addressing concerns over government spending and sector declines under the current New Democrat administration.

Tensions Lead to Conservative Departures

The party’s membership is composed entirely of former provincial Conservatives who left the caucus in recent weeks amidst dissatisfaction with party leader Kerry-Lynne Findlay. Nine legislators in total have resigned from the Conservatives following Findlay’s narrow leadership victory in May, with some critics suggesting the party has moved too far to the right and imposed rigid political purity tests.

Wat originally announced her resignation from the Conservative caucus on Aug. 26, pointing to unaddressed accusations made by Findlay that questioned her allegiance to Canada. Findlay later held a private meeting with Wat to apologize directly for the comments, while also characterising Wat’s departure as a betrayal of local campaign workers and supporters who backed her during the 2024 election.

Legislative Ranks Grow Ahead of By-Election

Wat, who was first elected to the B.C. legislature in 2013 as a member of the BC Liberals, explained that her decision to join Milobar’s caucus stems from a desire to offer a credible, unified alternative focused on affordability and competent governance.

Milobar and fellow defector Ian Paton initially launched the party last month after quitting the Conservatives. Their caucus expanded last week with the additions of Rosalyn Bird, Bruce Banman, and A’a:liya Warbus before Wat’s joining. These political shifts come just ahead of a Sept. 26 byelection in Abbotsford-Mission, which will decide whether Findlay secures a seat in the provincial legislature.

Continue Reading

BC STORIES

Abbotsford-Mission candidates clash on spending, taxes and trust ahead of byelection

Abbotsford-Mission candidates sparred over PST expansion, spending, and party stability during a livestamed byelection debate ahead of the Sept. 26 vote.

Published

on

Candidates clash in livestreamed forum ahead of Sept. 26 vote

Tensions flared during a live 90-minute debate hosted by the Abbotsford Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday evening, where four Abbotsford-Mission candidates traded sharp criticisms over economic strategy, tax policies, and political stability.

NDP candidate Pam Alexis capped off the evening by targeting Conservative Party of BC candidate Kerry-Lynne Findley, claiming Findley is unfamiliar with the constituency and is focused on internal party conflicts rather than building a collaborative community. Findley had earlier criticized the ruling NDP on provincial spending, red tape, and an inability to balance B.C.’s budget.

Taxation and economic platforms take center stage

A primary point of contention was the expansion of B.C.’s PST to professional services starting Oct. 1. Findley voiced strong opposition, stating that local small business owners and seniors are distressed over growing tax burdens. She attributed the province’s rising debt and credit downgrade to Premier David Eby’s administration.

Alexis defended the expanded tax base, explaining it was necessary to maintain public services following the elimination of B.C.’s carbon tax. She assured voters that revenue raised would be managed responsibly.

During a candidate-to-candidate questioning period, Alexis pressed Findley on recent Conservative party instability, pointing to nine individuals—including Abbotsford South MLA Bruce Banman—who recently departed the party. Findley rejected the characterization that those individuals worked alongside her, attributing the exits to a competitive leadership race.

CentreBC candidate Lakhwinder Jhaj asked Alexis whether she would ever vote against an NDP budget, to which Alexis replied she would voice concerns privately within government rather than vote against her party. Findley seized on the response, advocating for greater public transparency. BC Green Party candidate Stephen Fowler urged more proactive environmental action, stating climate change drives costly flood and wildfire emergencies.

Common ground on infrastructure and flood mitigation

Despite sharp exchanges, candidates found consensus on several local issues. All four agreed that federal assistance is crucial to protect the riding from future flooding, and all supported expanding transit options to alleviate persistent highway congestion.

Additionally, both Findley and Alexis favored expanding mental health resources, supporting local food processing on Agricultural Land Reserve property, and opening inter-provincial trade barriers to bolster B.C.’s economy.

The byelection, scheduled for Saturday, Sept. 26, was triggered after former Conservative MLA Reann Gasper resigned her seat on Aug. 22 to allow Findley to seek the nomination following Findley’s move to party leadership. The debate was moderated by University of the Fraser Valley professor Hamish Telford. BC Libertarian Party candidate Jeff Monds did not participate.

Continue Reading

NATIONAL STORIES

Why Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre Is Taking Canada’s Case Directly to American Viewers

Pierre Poilievre told CNBC in New York that Canadians feel wounded by U.S. tariffs, while refusing to criticize Prime Minister Mark Carney on foreign soil.

Published

on

Cross-Border Economic Advocacy in New York

During a visit to New York aimed at restoring standard trade relations, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre spoke with reporters on the American television network CNBC on Thursday. Poilievre expressed that Canadians are feeling “wounded” and “confused” after their economy became a primary target for U.S. President Donald Trump.

Highlighting the longstanding economic ties between the two nations, Poilievre stressed that tariff-free trade remains the proper path forward. While acknowledging that both countries have past grievances—pointing to previous American buy-America restrictions on subnational markets and tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber—he argued that both sides should sit down to resolve differences for mutual economic gain.

Refusing to Engage in Domestic Politics Abroad

When co-host Joe Kernen questioned him regarding Prime Minister Mark Carney’s good faith during recent trade negotiations, Poilievre declined to criticize the prime minister while outside the country. Emphasizing that domestic politics stops at the border, he stated that his mission in the U.S. was to advocate for Canada rather than score domestic political points. Co-host Kernen noted respect for Poilievre’s stance, observing that U.S. opposition politicians do not typically adhere to that convention.

Poilievre also refrained from faulting Canada’s national economic performance over the past decade when pressed by Kernen, choosing instead to highlight past policy successes across various government levels.

Building a North American Alliance

In a statement regarding his trip, Poilievre detailed plans to meet with business leaders and investors to protect jobs on both sides of the border. He described the American public as Canada’s greatest asset, noting his intention to make the case directly to them that open trade leads to greater safety, wealth, and affordability for both nations.

Looking toward broader global challenges, the Conservative leader cautioned that risks and rivals facing the U.S. are growing. He urged the United States to strengthen its Western alliance alongside nations committed to free speech, markets, and trade to form a secure continent through collaborative effort, rather than engaging in disputes with friendly allies.

Poilievre is extending his stay in New York through Friday for the 25th anniversary of 9/11 to honor victims and mark how both nations stood united following the attacks.

Continue Reading

Trending