BC STORIES

Canada’s Time Crisis: Why British Columbia is Ending the Clock Change While Others Wait for a Domino Effect

British Columbia is ending seasonal time changes permanently, but the rest of Canada remains locked in a collective action dilemma over daylight saving time.

Published

on

The Last ‘Spring Forward’ for British Columbia

As Canadians across the country prepare to nudge their clocks forward one hour this Sunday, residents of British Columbia are doing so with a unique sense of finality. Premier David Eby confirmed this week that the province is moving forward with a long-awaited plan to adopt permanent, year-round daylight saving time. The move marks the end of a decades-long debate in the Pacific province, effectively terminating the biannual ritual of ‘springing forward’ and ‘falling back’ that has governed Canadian life for generations.

The decision is rooted in both public health and overwhelming popular demand. Premier Eby highlighted the practical disruptions caused by the shift, noting that children and pets do not recognize the arbitrary change in time, leading to lost sleep for parents and increased stress for families. “When we change our clocks twice a year, it creates all kinds of problems,” Eby stated during the announcement. Beyond mere inconvenience, the Premier pointed to a spike in car accidents and a general decline in public well-being as primary drivers for the policy shift.

A History of Public Mandate and Political Stalling

British Columbia’s road to permanent daylight time has been long. In 2019, the province conducted one of the most successful public consultations in its history, with a staggering 93 per cent of the 223,000 respondents indicating they wanted to scrap the time change. While former premier John Horgan attempted to implement the change several times, the province initially hesitated, hoping to maintain alignment with southern neighbors in Washington, Oregon, and California.

However, B.C. has now decided to lead the charge. This bold move highlights a growing frustration with what political scientists call a ‘collective action problem.’ Peter Graefe, a political scientist at McMaster University, suggests that many jurisdictions are waiting for a leader to prove that the transition can be seamless. “Maybe it does take one place to move and it will have some impact in having other places saying, ‘Look, the sky didn’t fall, maybe we’ll try it as well,’” Graefe noted.

The Eastern Gridlock: Ontario and Quebec

In Central Canada, the situation is more complex. The Ontario legislature passed a bill in November 2020 that would end the time change, but with a significant caveat: the law only triggers if Quebec and New York State follow suit. This interdependence is driven by the need for economic and logistical synchronization, particularly regarding the stock markets and cross-border trade. Premier Doug Ford has expressed an openness to ending the practice, stating that Ontario will “eventually” stick with daylight saving time to stay in step with the rest of North America, but for now, the province remains in a holding pattern.

Quebec has similarly signaled that while they recognize the public desire to end the time change, no immediate legislative action is planned. Government officials in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Manitoba have also confirmed they are not currently pursuing a change, citing the need for regional alignment to avoid creating a patchwork of time zones that could disrupt travel and commerce.

The Prairie Divide

The debate remains particularly contentious in Alberta. In a 2021 municipal referendum, Albertans narrowly voted to keep the biannual change, with the ‘stay’ side winning by fewer than 3,000 votes. Despite this, the government led by Danielle Smith is re-examining the issue. Finance Minister Nate Horner recently suggested that the conversation is “probably coming towards us” again, as the government weighs the impact on airline schedules and professional sports against the potential health benefits.

Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek, however, has expressed skepticism about reopening the debate, suggesting that the narrow victory in 2021 should stand as a settled matter so that the government can focus on more pressing economic priorities.

The Biological Cost of Shifting Time

While the political debate focuses on trade and convenience, health experts are sounding the alarm on the biological toll of the time change. Rebecca Robillard, co-chair of the Canadian Sleep Research Consortium, argues that the issue is far more significant than losing a single hour of sleep. “It actually disrupts the alignment between the biological clock and the natural cycle of the sun,” she explained. This misalignment affects hormone release, insulin regulation, and metabolism.

Robillard points to a chilling list of ramifications associated with the time shift, including increased rates of stroke, heart attacks, mood swings, and even pregnancy complications. From a clinical perspective, the sudden shift forces the body into a state of ‘social jetlag’ that can take weeks to resolve.

The Counter-Argument: The Need for Morning Light

Despite the momentum for permanent daylight saving time, some experts warn of the downsides of year-round DST—specifically the loss of morning light in the winter. Patricia Lakin-Thomas, a professor at York University, notes that our circadian clocks are reset by morning light. Under permanent daylight saving time, some parts of Canada would not see the sun rise until nearly 10:00 a.m. in the middle of winter.

“Everybody loves the idea when you first announce it… but in the winter, we just hate it,” Lakin-Thomas warned. She argues that standard time is actually better for human health because it aligns more closely with the solar cycle, providing the morning light necessary to speed up our internal clocks and keep us in sync with the 24-hour day. As British Columbia embarks on this legislative experiment, the rest of the country—and the scientific community—will be watching closely to see if the benefits truly outweigh the costs.

Continue Reading

BC STORIES

Why B.C. Municipalities Are Demanding an End to Provincial Secrecy and Funding Cuts

B.C. municipal leaders gather at the UBCM convention to push back against provincial non-disclosure agreements and cuts to housing and FireSmart funding.

Published

on

Municipalities Push Back Against B.C. Government Policies

Municipal representatives from across British Columbia are preparing to confront the provincial government during the annual Union of B.C. Municipalities (UBCM) convention, scheduled for Sept. 14 to Sept. 18 in Vancouver. Local leaders plan to present three special resolutions targeting what they describe as an expanding “climate of secrecy” and the loss of critical community funding streams.

A primary point of contention is the provincial ministry’s widespread application of non-disclosure agreements. UBCM president Cori Ramsay stated that municipal employees are increasingly required to sign NDAs prior to discussing routine matters with provincial counterparts, sometimes before the subject of the meeting is even disclosed.

While acknowledging that non-disclosure agreements are appropriate at specific stages to safeguard cabinet confidentiality, Ramsay noted that current practices prevent transparent discussion on subjects of public interest. The executive’s resolution requests that the province restrict NDA requirements during local consultations to exceptional circumstances only.

Funding Reversals Cause Financial Strain

Local governments are also challenging the cancellation of $775 million from the Community Housing Fund, an intake suspended without advance warning during February’s provincial budget announcement. Ramsay indicated that 89 communities experienced lost investment on projects already underway, highlighting that developments in Parksville and Squamish had each spent approximately $1 million prior to the decision.

Wildfire preparedness represents another key area of friction. Concerns emerged early in the year when communities including West Kelowna reported diminishing FireSmart resources. The province subsequently limited the remaining $25 million by excluding fuel management and recovery initiatives, roughly six months before declaring a provincial state of emergency for wildfires. Municipalities are advocating for a predictable, long-term funding framework to enable multi-year wildfire mitigation efforts.

Upcoming Political Engagement

The upcoming convention takes place one month prior to local government elections set for Oct. 17. Despite the timing, Ramsay expects robust attendance from mayors and councillors, whether they intend to retire or seek re-election.

In addition to debating resolutions, delegates are scheduled to hear from provincial figures including Premier David Eby and B.C. Conservative Leader Kerry-Lynne Findlay. Agenda topics also include discussion on the local impacts of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) and modern treaty implementation.

Continue Reading

BC STORIES

Why a Former Island Mountie Received a Conditional Discharge After Court Hearing

A former Vancouver Island RCMP officer was granted a conditional discharge with 18 months probation after pleading guilty to breach of trust in Nanaimo.

Published

on

Conditional Discharge Handed Down in Nanaimo Court

A former Vancouver Island police officer who had a sexual encounter with a vulnerable woman following his shift will avoid a criminal record if he successfully completes an 18-month probation sentence.

Mark Tyler Hilland, 47, received a conditional discharge in B.C. provincial court in Nanaimo from Judge Reginald Harris on Friday, Sept. 11. Hilland had previously entered a guilty plea to breach of trust by a public officer in relation to a July 2, 2024 incident.

Details of the Offence and Court Findings

According to an agreed statement of facts, Hilland was completing paperwork in his service vehicle when he was approached by an Indigenous woman with whom he was acquainted. Her identity is protected by a publication ban. Unknown to Hilland at the time, she had prior involvement in the sex trade.

After Hilland left for an assignment, the woman was propositioned by another man for sex—an interaction described by Crown counsel Andrew McLean as negative and triggering traumatic past memories. Though she reported that encounter to police, Hilland was unaware of her report.

Later that evening, Hilland noticed she appeared distressed and asked how she was feeling. During their conversation, she exhibited flirtatious behavior and gave him her address, phone number, and door code, inviting him over once his shift ended. Following his shift on July 3, 2024, Hilland called her, visited her residence, and the two had consensual sex.

When they met again later, Hilland called the encounter a mistake and stated he would no longer contact her. Although she initially accepted this, she yelled an obscenity as he drove away and reported his actions to the Nanaimo RCMP.

PTSD Diagnosis and Impact

The court heard that Hilland was diagnosed in 2019 with post-traumatic stress disorder, alongside depression, mood alterations, and sleep difficulties. Before this event, he had served in high-crime or demanding posts, including Fort St. James and Gabriola Island, and responded to most critical incidents while stationed in Nanaimo.

Judge Harris determined that Hilland was suffering from PTSD during the incident, concluding that without the disorder, he would not have engaged in the impulsive and self-destructive behavior. While Crown counsel sought a suspended sentence that would entail a criminal record, defence counsel Brad Kielmann argued for a conditional discharge.

In granting the discharge, Harris noted Hilland’s lack of a prior criminal record, good character, and the severe impact a record would have on his employment. Harris ruled that a discharge was not contrary to the public interest despite the harm caused to the community and the woman’s vulnerability.

Probation Terms and Departure from Force

The victim did not submit a victim impact statement but told police she feared Hilland might return, experienced sleep disruptions, and worried about her parents’ reactions, noting it took a year to feel like herself again.

Under the conditions of his 18-month probation order, Hilland is forbidden from contacting the woman and must write a letter of apology to be delivered through his probation officer. His employment with the RCMP officially ended on Aug. 14 when he was discharged.

Continue Reading

BC STORIES

BC Conservative Defector Teresa Wat Joins New Provincial Party Caucus

Teresa Wat joins Peter Milobar’s new provincial party as its sixth member, creating B.C.’s third-largest legislative caucus following Conservative departures.

Published

on

Expanding New Party Becomes B.C.’s Third-Largest Caucus

Richmond-area MLA Teresa Wat has joined the newly formed provincial political party established by former Opposition finance critic Peter Milobar. Wat becomes the sixth member to join the still-unnamed group, which will form the third-largest caucus in the British Columbia legislature behind the NDP and the Conservatives when the assembly reconvenes next month.

Milobar, who serves as the interim leader, stated that Wat’s addition on Friday demonstrates growing momentum for a serious right-of-centre alternative aimed at addressing concerns over government spending and sector declines under the current New Democrat administration.

Tensions Lead to Conservative Departures

The party’s membership is composed entirely of former provincial Conservatives who left the caucus in recent weeks amidst dissatisfaction with party leader Kerry-Lynne Findlay. Nine legislators in total have resigned from the Conservatives following Findlay’s narrow leadership victory in May, with some critics suggesting the party has moved too far to the right and imposed rigid political purity tests.

Wat originally announced her resignation from the Conservative caucus on Aug. 26, pointing to unaddressed accusations made by Findlay that questioned her allegiance to Canada. Findlay later held a private meeting with Wat to apologize directly for the comments, while also characterising Wat’s departure as a betrayal of local campaign workers and supporters who backed her during the 2024 election.

Legislative Ranks Grow Ahead of By-Election

Wat, who was first elected to the B.C. legislature in 2013 as a member of the BC Liberals, explained that her decision to join Milobar’s caucus stems from a desire to offer a credible, unified alternative focused on affordability and competent governance.

Milobar and fellow defector Ian Paton initially launched the party last month after quitting the Conservatives. Their caucus expanded last week with the additions of Rosalyn Bird, Bruce Banman, and A’a:liya Warbus before Wat’s joining. These political shifts come just ahead of a Sept. 26 byelection in Abbotsford-Mission, which will decide whether Findlay secures a seat in the provincial legislature.

Continue Reading

Trending